Comment on `A simple explanation of the non-appearance of physical gluons and quarks'
Andreas Aste (University of Basel)

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent claim that non-appearance of physical gluons and quarks is automatic in QCD, providing counterarguments to challenge the original assertion.
Contribution
It offers a critical analysis and refutes the claim that non-abelian color interactions automatically exclude physical gluons and quarks.
Findings
Counterarguments undermine the claim of automatic non-appearance
Highlights the need for more detailed explanations in QCD
Questions simplified explanations of confinement mechanisms
Abstract
In a recent paper by Johan Hansson [hep-ph/0208137] it is claimed that the non-appearance of quarks and gluons as physical particles is an automatic result of the nonabelian nature of the color interaction in quantum chromodynamics. It is shown that the arguments given by Hansson are insufficient to support his claim by giving simple counter arguments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
