Multi-Trace Superpotentials vs. Matrix Models
Vijay Balasubramanian, Jan de Boer, Bo Feng, Yang-Hui He, Min-xin, Huang, Vishnu Jejjala, and Asad Naqvi

TL;DR
This paper explores the computation of effective superpotentials in N=1 supersymmetric U(N) gauge theories with multi-trace superpotentials, revealing unique contributions from non-planar diagrams and connections to matrix models and Seiberg-Witten theory.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to compute the effective action for multi-trace superpotentials, highlighting differences from single-trace cases and establishing a link to multi-trace matrix models.
Findings
Only a subset of planar diagrams contribute to the exact result.
The effective action differs from the derivative of a multi-trace matrix model free energy.
The superpotential can be derived from the N=2 Seiberg-Witten solution.
Abstract
We consider N = 1 supersymmetric U(N) field theories in four dimensions with adjoint chiral matter and a multi-trace tree-level superpotential. We show that the computation of the effective action as a function of the glueball superfield localizes to computing matrix integrals. Unlike the single-trace case, holomorphy and symmetries do not forbid non-planar contributions. Nevertheless, only a special subset of the planar diagrams contributes to the exact result. Some of the data of this subset can be computed from the large-N limit of an associated multi-trace Matrix model. However, the prescription differs in important respects from that of Dijkgraaf and Vafa for single-trace superpotentials in that the field theory effective action is not the derivative of a multi-trace matrix model free energy. The basic subtlety involves the correct identification of the field theory glueball as a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
