Are there really any AdS_2 branes in the euclidean (or not) AdS_3?
Benedicte Ponsot, Sebastian Silva

TL;DR
This paper investigates the existence of AdS_2 branes in Euclidean and non-Euclidean AdS_3 models, concluding they do not exist in certain models and exploring boundary conditions through analytical continuation.
Contribution
It demonstrates the non-existence of AdS_2 branes in specific WZNW models and analyzes boundary conditions via analytical continuation in the SL(2,R) model.
Findings
No AdS_2 branes found in H_3^+ and SL(2,R) models
Boundary branes with su(2) symmetry likely reside on AdS_3 boundary
Euclidean spacetime cannot realize certain boundary conditions
Abstract
We do not find any AdS_2 branes, neither in the H_3^+ WZNW model nor the SL(2,R) WZNW model. We then reexamine the case of the branes that possess a su(2) symmetry: we speculate that they would have to live on the boundary of AdS_3. This cannot be realized in an euclidean spacetime, but in the SL(2,R) WZNW model by analytical continuation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
