Penrose Limits, Worldvolume Fluxes and Supersymmetry
David Mateos

TL;DR
The paper investigates the conditions under which Penrose limits exist for brane probes with worldvolume fluxes and finds that when they do, supersymmetry preservation is unaffected, linking to the infinite-tension limit concept.
Contribution
It clarifies the relationship between Penrose limits, worldvolume fluxes, and supersymmetry preservation, highlighting cases where the limit exists and its implications.
Findings
Finite Penrose limits for fluxed branes are rare
Supersymmetry is preserved when the limit exists
Penrose limit relates to the infinite-tension limit
Abstract
It is noted that a finite Penrose limit for brane probes with non-zero worldvolume fluxes does not generically exist; this is closely related to the observation by Blau et al that for a brane probe the Penrose limit is equivalent to an infinite-tension limit. It is shown that when the limit exists, however, the number of supersymmetries preserved by the probe does not decrease.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
