Reply to 'Comment on "Relativistic extension of shape-invariant potentials"'

TL;DR

This paper responds to a comment on their previous work, acknowledging a gauge consideration error but asserting that their main findings remain valid despite this issue.

Contribution

The authors clarify their results' validity despite a gauge consideration error pointed out in a comment.

Findings

Main results remain accurate despite gauge consideration error

Acknowledgment of the error and plan for correction

Reaffirmation of the validity of previous findings

Abstract

We concur with de Castro's observation that the gauge considerations of our approach are not valid. Nevertheless, except for an error that will be corrected, all of our findings are accurate independent of those considerations.