Why 3 + 1 metric rather than 4 + 0 or 2 + 2?
H. van Dam, Y. Jack Ng (University of North Carolina)

TL;DR
The paper explains why our universe's spacetime has a 3+1 signature rather than other configurations, using group theory to show that multiple time dimensions lead to physically unacceptable infinite-dimensional representations.
Contribution
It provides a group-theoretic explanation for the 3+1 signature of spacetime, highlighting why multiple time dimensions are physically implausible.
Findings
3+1 signature is favored due to finite-dimensional unitary representations
Higher-dimensional spaces with multiple time dimensions have infinite-dimensional representations
The approach applies to flat spaces of higher dimensions
Abstract
Why does the physical 4-dimensional space have a 3 + 1 signature rather than a 4 + 0 or a 2 + 2 for its metric? We give a simple explanation based largely on a group-theoretic argument a la Wigner. Applied to flat spaces of higher dimensions the same approach indicates that metrics with more than one time dimension are physically unacceptable because the corresponding irreducible unitary representations are infinite dimensional (besides the trivial representation).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
