BPS Domain Walls in super Yang-Mills and Landau-Ginzburg models
B. de Carlos, M.B. Hindmarsh, N. McNair, J.M. Moreno

TL;DR
This paper investigates domain walls in super Yang-Mills and Landau-Ginzburg models, highlighting differences in their patterns despite similar effective limits, and provides physical motivation for an additional field.
Contribution
It introduces and compares two extensions of super Yang-Mills without logarithmic terms, explaining their differences and physical motivations for the extra field Y.
Findings
Different domain wall patterns in the models despite same effective limit
Explanation of the origin of these differences
Physical motivation for the additional field Y
Abstract
We study domain walls in two different extensions of super Yang--Mills characterized by the absence of a logarithmic term in their effective superpotential. The models, defined by the usual gaugino condensate and an extra field Y, give different patterns of domain walls despite both leading to the same effective limit for heavy Y, i.e. the Veneziano--Yankielowicz effective Lagrangian of super Yang--Mills. We explain the origin of those differences and also give a physical motivation for introducing the field Y.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
