Hamiltonian vs Lagrangian Embedding of a Massive Spin-one Theory Involving 2-form Field
E. Harikumar, M. Sivakumar

TL;DR
This paper compares Hamiltonian and Lagrangian embeddings of a massive spin-one gauge theory with an antisymmetric tensor field, highlighting differences in their constraint structures and gauge reducibility.
Contribution
It applies the BFV-BRST approach to embed the model into a first class system and analyzes the contrasting features of the embedded Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formulations.
Findings
The embedded Hamiltonian and Lagrangian models have distinct constraint structures.
Manifestly covariant St"uckelberg Lagrangian requires further phase space enlargement.
Reducible gauge structure naturally emerges in the embedded model.
Abstract
We consider the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian embedding of a first-order, massive spin-one, gauge non-invariant theory involving anti-symmetric tensor field. We apply the BFV-BRST generalised canonical approach to convert the model to a first class system and construct nil-potent BFV-BRST charge and an unitarising Hamiltonian. The canonical analysis of the St\"uckelberg formulation of this model is presented. We bring out the contrasting feature in the constraint structure, specifically with respect to the reducibility aspect, of the Hamiltonian and the Lagrangian embedded model. We show that to obtain manifestly covariant St\"uckelberg Lagrangian from the BFV embedded Hamiltonian, phase space has to be further enlarged and show how the reducible gauge structure emerges in the embedded model.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
