A Note on Embedding of M-Theory Corrections into Eleven-Dimensional Superspace
Hitoshi Nishino, Subhash Rajpoot

TL;DR
This paper investigates the constraints on embedding M-theory corrections into eleven-dimensional superspace supergravity, concluding that only limited modifications are possible under certain assumptions, thus guiding future research directions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that M-theory corrections cannot be embedded into standard superspace constraints at dimension zero, except for a specific scalar superfield scaling, under particular assumptions.
Findings
M-theory corrections cannot be embedded into dimension zero constraints.
The only modification is a scalar superfield scaling of F_{ ext{a} ext{b} ext{c} ext{d}}.
Additional modifications require relaxing certain assumptions.
Abstract
By analyzing eleven-dimensional superspace fourth-rank superfield strength F-Bianchi identities, we show that M-theory corrections to eleven-dimensional supergravity can not be embedded into the mass dimension zero constraints, such as the (\g^{a b})_{\a\b} X_{a b}{}^c or i (\g^{a_1... a_5})_{\a\b} X_{a_1... a_5}{}^c -terms in the supertorsion constraint T_{\a\b}{}^c. The only possible modification of superspace constraint at dimension zero is found to be the scaling of F_{\a\b c d} like F_{\a\b c d} = (1/2) \big(\g_{c d}\big)_{\a\b} e^\Phi for some real scalar superfield \Phi, which alone is further shown not enough to embed general M-theory corrections. This conclusion is based on the dimension zero F-Bianchi identity under the two assumptions: (i) There are no negative dimensional constraints on the F-superfield strength: F_{\a\b\g\d} = F_{\a\b\g d} =0; (ii) The supertorsion…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
