Type IIB Orientifolds without Untwisted Tadpoles, and non-BPS D-branes
R. Rabadan, A. M. Uranga

TL;DR
This paper constructs non-supersymmetric Type IIB orientifolds with vanishing untwisted RR tadpoles but non-zero twisted tadpoles, using brane-antibrane systems to achieve stability and consistency, and studies phase transitions and model implications.
Contribution
It introduces explicit non-supersymmetric models with stable non-BPS branes that cancel twisted tadpoles, including resolving previous inconsistencies in certain orientifolds.
Findings
Models are stable against decay to supersymmetric vacua.
Tachyonic modes can trigger phase transitions between non-BPS configurations.
The $ ext{T}^6/ ext{Z}_4$ orientifold without vector structure can be made consistent with brane-antibrane pairs.
Abstract
We discuss the construction of six- and four-dimensional Type IIB orientifolds with vanishing untwisted RR tadpoles, but generically non-zero twisted RR tadpoles. Tadpole cancellation requires the introduction of D-brane systems with zero untwisted RR charge, but non-zero twisted RR charges. We construct explicit models containing branes and antibranes at fixed points of the internal space, or non-BPS branes partially wrapped on it. The models are non-supersymmetric, but are absolutely stable against decay to supersymmetric vacua. For particular values of the compactification radii tachyonic modes may develop, triggering phase transitions between the different types of non-BPS configurations of branes, which we study in detail in a particular example. As an interesting spin-off, we show that the orientifold without vector structure, previously considered inconsistent due…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
