Pauli Terms Must Be Absent In Dirac Equation
Kurt Just, James Thevenot

TL;DR
This paper investigates the algebraic structure of Dirac's equation, demonstrating that Pauli terms violate fundamental algebraic axioms and are thus absent from the Dirac operator, which is spanned only by specific basis elements.
Contribution
It proves that Pauli terms cannot be part of Dirac's equation due to algebraic constraints, refining the understanding of its algebraic basis.
Findings
Pauli terms violate *-algebra axioms in Dirac's equation
Dirac operator is spanned only by 10 specific basis elements
Pauli terms are excluded from the Dirac algebra
Abstract
It should be of interest, whether Dirac's equation involves all 16 basis elements of his Clifford algebra These include the 6 `tensorial' with which the `Pauli terms' are formed. We find that these violate a basic axiom of any *-algebra, when Dirac's is canonical. Then the Dirac operator is spanned only by the 10 elements (which don't form a basis of because the are excluded).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic and Geometric Analysis · Advanced Operator Algebra Research · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
