Quantum and Classical Gauge Symmetries in a Modified Quantization Scheme
Kazuo Fujikawa, Hiroaki Terashima (Department of Physics,, University of Tokyo)

TL;DR
This paper explores a modified quantization scheme that relates massive vector theories to gauge invariant formulations, extending the concept of quantum gauge symmetry beyond classical gauge theories and analyzing its implications.
Contribution
It demonstrates the equivalence of a modified quantization scheme to the Faddeev-Popov method without large mass limits and proposes extending quantum gauge symmetry to theories with broken gauge invariance.
Findings
Modified quantization scheme matches Faddeev-Popov formula without large mass limit
Classical massive vector theories can be viewed as gauge invariant or non-gauge theories
Extended quantum gauge symmetry applies to theories with broken gauge invariance
Abstract
The use of the mass term as a gauge fixing term has been studied by Zwanziger, Parrinello and Jona-Lasinio, which is related to the non-linear gauge of Dirac and Nambu in the large mass limit. We have recently shown that this modified quantization scheme is in fact identical to the conventional {\em local} Faddeev-Popov formula {\em without} taking the large mass limit, if one takes into account the variation of the gauge field along the entire gauge orbit and if the Gribov complications can be ignored. This suggests that the classical massive vector theory, for example, is interpreted in a more flexible manner either as a gauge invariant theory with a gauge fixing term added, or as a conventional massive non-gauge theory. As for massive gauge particles, the Higgs mechanics, where the mass term is gauge invariant, has a more intrinsic meaning. It is suggested to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
