A Higgs or Not a Higgs? What to Do if You Discover a New Scalar Particle
C.P. Burgess (McGill University), J. Matias (IFAE, U. Aut. Barcelona), and M. Pospelov (U. Minnesota)

TL;DR
This paper presents a systematic method for analyzing potential discoveries of new scalar particles in collider experiments, aiming to identify their nature without relying on strong prior assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces a model-independent framework and decision tree approach to distinguish the properties of new scalar particles in collider data.
Findings
Provides a classification scheme for scalar particles
Develops a decision tree for experimental analysis
Minimizes theoretical assumptions in interpretation
Abstract
We show how to systematically analyze what may be inferred should a new scalar particle be discovered in collider experiments. Our approach is systematic in the sense that we perform the analysis in a manner which minimizes apriori theoretical assumptions as to the nature of the scalar particle. For instance, we do not immediately make the common assumption that a new scalar particle is a Higgs boson, and so must interact with a strength proportional to the mass of the particles with which it couples. We show how to compare different observables, and so to develop a decision tree from which the nature of the new particle may be discerned. We define several categories of models, which summarize the kinds of distinctions which the first experiments can make.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
