About R-parity and the Supersymmetric Standard Model
Pierre Fayet

TL;DR
This paper reviews the obstacles, theoretical foundations, and phenomenological implications of R-parity in the supersymmetric Standard Model, emphasizing its role in particle stability and experimental searches for supersymmetric particles.
Contribution
It clarifies the origin, significance, and phenomenological role of R-parity in the supersymmetric Standard Model, connecting theoretical constructs with experimental implications.
Findings
R-parity ensures the stability of the lightest supersymmetric particle
It forbids unwanted squark and slepton exchanges
R-parity is crucial for supersymmetric phenomenology
Abstract
We recall the obstacles which seemed, long ago, to prevent one from viewing supersymmetry as a possible fundamental symmetry of Nature. Is spontaneous supersymmetry breaking possible ? Where is the spin-1/2 Goldstone fermion of supersymmetry, if not a neutrino ? Which bosons and fermions could be related ? Can one define conserved baryon and lepton numbers in such theories, although they systematically involve self-conjugate Majorana fermions ? If we have to postulate the existence of new bosons carrying B and L (the new spin-0 squarks and sleptons), can we prevent them from mediating new unwanted interactions ? We then recall how we obtained the three basic ingredients of the Supersymmetric Standard Model: 1) the SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) gauge superfields; 2) the chiral quark and lepton superfields; 3) the two doublet Higgs superfields responsible for the electroweak breaking, and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
