Electroweak Penguin Contributions to Non-Leptonic Delta F = 1 Decays at NNLO
A. J. Buras, P. Gambino, U. Haisch

TL;DR
This paper computes NNLO electroweak penguin corrections to non-leptonic Delta F=1 decays, reducing uncertainties in theoretical predictions and scheme dependence, especially for B- and K-decay processes.
Contribution
It provides the complete NNLO corrections to electroweak penguin Wilson coefficients, improving precision in non-leptonic decay calculations.
Findings
NNLO corrections to C_9 are moderate (~few percent) and scheme-independent.
Larger NNLO corrections with scheme dependence are found for C_7, C_8, C_10.
Reduced scheme dependence of C_8 improves epsilon'/epsilon predictions.
Abstract
We calculate the O(alpha_s) corrections to the Z^0-penguin and electroweak box diagrams relevant for non-leptonic Delta F = 1 decays with F = S, B. This calculation provides the complete O(alpha_w alpha_s) and O(alpha_w alpha_s sin^2 theta_w m_t^2) corrections (alpha_w = alpha/sin^2 theta_w) to the Wilson coefficients of the electroweak penguin four quark operators relevant for non-leptonic K- and B-decays. We argue that this is the dominant part of the next-next-to-leading (NNLO) contributions to these coefficients. Our results allow to reduce considerably the uncertainty due to the definition of the top quark mass present in the existing NLO calculations of non-leptonic decays. The NNLO corrections to the coefficient of the color singlet (V-A)x(V-A) electroweak penguin operator Q_9 relevant for B-decays are generally moderate, amount to a few percent for the choice m_t(mu_t = m_t) and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
