Fine-Tuning Constraints on Supergravity Models
M. Bastero-Gil, G. L. Kane, S. F. King

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how experimental mass limits on key particles constrain supergravity models, highlighting the varying degrees of fine-tuning required across different models and discussing prospects for early discovery at colliders.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of fine-tuning constraints on various supergravity models based on experimental mass limits, including D-brane models and anomaly mediation.
Findings
D-brane models are less fine-tuned than others.
Fine-tuning increases with experimental mass limits.
Early collider discovery prospects are discussed.
Abstract
We discuss fine-tuning constraints on supergravity models. The tightest constraints come from the experimental mass limits on two key particles: the lightest CP even Higgs boson and the gluino. We also include the lightest chargino which is relevant when universal gaugino masses are assumed. For each of these particles we show how fine-tuning increases with the experimental mass limit, for four types of supergravity model: minimal supergravity, no-scale supergravity (relaxing the universal gaugino mass assumption), D-brane models and anomaly mediated supersymmetry breaking models. Among these models, the D-brane model is less fine tuned.The experimental propects for an early discovery of Higgs and supersymmetry at LEP and the Tevatron are discussed in this framework.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
