Comment on the Matrix Element of $O_{11}$
Xiao-Gang He, German Valencia

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the matrix element of the gluon dipole operator $O_{11}$, highlighting discrepancies with previous estimates and emphasizing the importance of accurate calculations in SUSY models.
Contribution
It provides a reassessment of the matrix element of $O_{11}$, comparing it with earlier estimates and clarifying its numerical accuracy.
Findings
The commonly used matrix element estimate is roughly numerically accurate.
Previous estimates may be coincidentally close due to dimensional analysis.
The paper emphasizes the need for precise calculations in SUSY-related operators.
Abstract
The gluon dipole operator, , has received much attention recently because it can have a large coefficient in some SUSY extensions of the standard model. We find that the commonly used matrix element of of Bertolini, Eeg and Fabbrichesi is in rough (but accidental) numerical agreement with an estimate based on dimensional analysis.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
