The $\nu_\mu \leftrightarrow \nu_s$ interpretation of the atmospheric neutrino data and cosmological constraints
Pasquale Di Bari, Paolo Lipari, Maurizio Lusignoli (INFN, Sezione, di Roma, and Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita' di Roma "La Sapienza", Roma,, Italy)

TL;DR
This paper explores how sterile neutrino oscillations can explain atmospheric neutrino data without conflicting with cosmological constraints by generating lepton asymmetry through tau neutrino mixing.
Contribution
It demonstrates that small tau neutrino mixing can suppress sterile neutrino production, resolving conflicts with big bang nucleosynthesis constraints.
Findings
Sterile neutrino oscillations can explain atmospheric neutrino data.
Tau neutrino mixing can generate lepton asymmetry to suppress sterile oscillations.
The tau neutrino mass must be larger than a few eV to be compatible with cosmology.
Abstract
The data on atmospheric neutrinos can be explained assuming the existence of oscillations between muon neutrinos and light sterile neutrinos with mixing close to maximal, and Delta_m^2 approximately equal to 3 E-3 (eV^2). This interpretation of the data is in potential conflict with the successes of big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), since oscillations can result in a too large contribution of the sterile state to the energy density of the universe at the epoch of nucleosynthesis. The possibility to evade these cosmological constraints has been recently the object of some controversy. In this work we rediscuss this problem and find that the inclusion of a small mixing of the sterile state with tau neutrino can result in the generation of a large lepton asymmetry that strongly suppress the muon-sterile neutrino oscillations eliminating the possible conflict with BBN bounds. In this scheme…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
