Supersymmetry and Future Colliders
M. M. Nojiri(YITP)

TL;DR
This paper reviews precision studies of supersymmetry at LHC and future linear colliders, focusing on decay processes, mass measurements, and model-independent constraints on supersymmetric particles.
Contribution
It introduces new methods for constraining neutralino and slepton masses using decay distributions and asymmetries at colliders, enhancing SUSY parameter determination.
Findings
Decay distributions constrain ino mixing and slepton masses.
Asymmetry peaks provide model-independent mass information.
High-precision measurements at LC can determine sparticle couplings and squark mass scales.
Abstract
In this talk, I review precision SUSY study at LHC and TeV scale e+e- linear colliders (LC). We discuss the study of the 3 body decay of the second lightest neutralino \chi^0_2--> \chi^0_1 ll or the 2 body decay \chi^0_2-->\tilde{l}l at LHC. In the former case, the whole m_{ll} distribution observed at LHC would constrain ino mixing and slepton masses. On the other hand, when \tilde{l}l decay is open, the distribution of the asymmetry of the transverse momentum of lepton pair A_T= p_{T1}/p_{T2} peaks at A_E=p_{1}/p_{2} in \chi^0_2 rest frame for m_{ll} << m^{max}_{ll} samples, providing another model independent information. The peak position and the edge of the m_{ll} distribution constrain m_{\chi^0_2}, m_{\chi}^0_1} and m_{\tilde{l}}. Slepton mass universality may be checked within a few % in the early stage of the experiment. Finally I discuss the physics at TeVscale LC. The mass…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Particle Detector Development and Performance · Computational Physics and Python Applications
