A remark on the muonium to antimuonium conversionin a 331 model
V. Pleitez

TL;DR
This paper examines how the muonium to antimuonium conversion constraints relate to a 331 model with doubly charged bileptons, showing that experimental bounds can be evaded due to additional contributions in the model.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the experimental constraints on bilepton mass can be bypassed in the minimal 331 model by considering other contributing factors.
Findings
Experimental bounds on bilepton mass can be evaded.
Additional contributions affect the conversion process.
Conditions for the validity of experimental constraints are discussed.
Abstract
Here we analyze the relation between the search for muonium to antimuonium conversion and the 331 model with doubly charged bileptons. We show that the constraint on the mass of the vector bilepton obtained by experimental data can be evaded even in the minimal version of the model since there are other contributions to that conversion. We also discuss the condition for which the experimental data constraint is valid.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
