Are there short distance non-perturbative contributions to the QCD static potential?
Gunnar S. Bali (Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limitations of perturbation theory in describing the short-range static potential in QCD, revealing significant non-perturbative contributions at distances greater than 1/(6 GeV).
Contribution
It demonstrates that non-perturbative effects are substantial at short distances, challenging the adequacy of perturbation theory in this regime.
Findings
Perturbation theory fails for r > 1/(6 GeV) in static potential.
Non-perturbative potential differs from perturbative predictions by a linear term.
The linear term has a slope of approximately 1.2 GeV^2, exceeding the string tension.
Abstract
We find that perturbation theory fails to describe the short range static potential as obtained from quenched lattice simulations, at least for source separations r > 1/(6 GeV). The difference between the non-perturbatively determined potential and perturbation theory at short distance is well parameterised by a linear term with a slope of approximately 1.2 GeV^2 that is significantly bigger than the string tension, sigma = 0.21 GeV^2
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
