On Limitations of T Invariance in K Decays
I.I. Bigi, A.I. Sanda

TL;DR
This paper examines the limitations of using T invariance as evidence for T violation in K decays, showing that observed phenomena can be explained without assuming T violation by fine-tuning CPT breaking effects.
Contribution
It demonstrates that T invariance can reproduce key experimental results in K decays through CPT breaking, challenging the interpretation of these results as direct evidence of T violation.
Findings
Large T-odd correlations can be explained without T violation.
Phase of epsilon'/epsilon can be consistent with T invariance.
CPT asymmetries in K decays could be larger than previously thought.
Abstract
Data from the CPLEAR collaboration coupled with the assumption that the Bell-Steinberger relation holds have provided {\em direct} evidence for \ot~violation. In this note we investigate what we can say about \ot~violation {\em without} such an assumption. We show that both the modulus and the phase of can be reproduced with \ot~{\em invariant} dynamics through finetuning \cpt~breaking. The large \ot~odd correlation observed by the KTeV collaboration in thus does not yield direct evidence for \ot~violation. In such a world the phase of is . Also, could exhibit a \cpt~asymmetry of up to few without upsetting any known bound.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
