Standard Model Confronting New Results for epsilon'/epsilon
S. Bosch, A.J. Buras, M. Gorbahn, S. J\"ager, M. Jamin, M.E., Lautenbacher, L. Silvestrini

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the Standard Model's predictions for epsilon'/epsilon against recent experimental results, examining non-perturbative parameters, scheme dependence, and implications for new physics parameters.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of epsilon'/epsilon within the Standard Model, incorporating updated parameters and exploring conditions under which theoretical predictions align with experimental data.
Findings
Standard Model predictions for epsilon'/epsilon are below experimental values.
Extreme parameter choices can reconcile theory with data.
Implications for CKM parameters and new physics constraints are discussed.
Abstract
We analyze the CP violating ratio \epe=epsilon'/epsilon in the Standard Model in view of the new KTeV results. We review the present status of the most important non-perturbative parameters B_6, B_8, B_K and of the strange quark mass m_s. We also briefly discuss the issues of final state interactions and renormalization scheme dependence. Updating the values of the CKM parameters, of m_t and Lambda (MSbar) and using Gaussian errors for the experimental input and flat distributions for the theoretical parameters we find \epe substantially below the NA31 and KTeV data: \epe= (7.7^{+6.0}_{-3.5}) 10^{-4} and \epe= (5.2^{+4.6}_{-2.7}) 10^{-4} in the NDR and HV renormalization schemes respectively. A simple scanning of all input parameters gives on the other hand 1.05 10^{-4} < \epe < 28.8 10^{-4} and 0.26 10^{-4} < \epe < 22.0 10^{-4} respectively. Analyzing the dependence on various…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
