Reply to Comment on "Pulsar velocities and neutrino oscillations"
Alexander Kusenko (CERN), Gino Segre (University of Pennsylvania)

TL;DR
This paper discusses different approximation methods for calculating neutrino-driven pulsar velocities, comparing their predictions for magnetic fields inside neutron stars and emphasizing the uncertainties involved.
Contribution
It clarifies the impact of different approximation assumptions on neutrino oscillation models for pulsar velocities, highlighting their reasonable agreement.
Findings
Different approximation methods yield similar predictions within uncertainties.
The assumption of constant electron fraction (Ye) affects magnetic field estimates.
Uncertainties in magnetic field geometry influence model predictions.
Abstract
We have recently proposed an explanation for the birth velocities of pulsars based on neutrino oscillations (hep-ph/9606428). One of the quantities, dN/dT, was evaluated in the approximation of constant chemical potential for the electrons. An alternative approximation based on the assumption Ye=const, used by Qian (astro-ph/9705055), yields a somewhat higher prediction for the magnetic field inside a neutron star. If the same input parameters are used, the two approximations are in reasonable agreement, given the uncertainty in the geometry of the magnetic field and the simplified picture of neutrino emission that comes with the notion of a neutrinosphere.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
