Comment on "Observability of the Neutrino Charge Radius"
Kazuo Fujikawa (Univ. Tokyo), Robert Shrock (YITP, Stony Brook)

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a previous claim that the neutrino charge radius is a gauge-independent physical observable, and demonstrates that it is generally gauge-dependent, challenging its physical observability.
Contribution
The paper refutes prior claims by showing that the neutrino charge radius is gauge-dependent, thus questioning its status as a physical observable.
Findings
Neutrino charge radius is gauge-dependent.
Previous claims of gauge independence are incorrect.
The NCR cannot be considered a physical observable.
Abstract
In Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 101802 (2002); erratum, ibid. 89, 229902(E) (2002), Bernabeu, Papavassiliou, and Vidal claim that they can extract a gauge-independent neutrino charge radius (NCR) which is, therefore, a physical observable. We show here that this claim is incorrect by demonstrating that the NCR is, in general, gauge-dependent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeutrino Physics Research · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
