# Can we do better than Hybrid Monte Carlo in Lattice QCD?

**Authors:** M.E. Berbenni-Bitsch, A.P. Gottlob, S. Meyer, M. Puetz

arXiv: hep-lat/9608120 · 2009-10-28

## TL;DR

This paper compares Hybrid Monte Carlo and Kramers equation algorithms for lattice QCD simulations, analyzing their autocorrelation times and performance on a parallel computer.

## Contribution

It provides a comparative analysis of two algorithms for lattice QCD, highlighting differences in autocorrelation times for various observables.

## Key findings

- Substantially different autocorrelation times for local and nonlocal observables.
- Performance differences observed on CRAY T3D.
- Insights into algorithm efficiency for lattice QCD simulations.

## Abstract

The Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for the simulation of QCD with dynamical staggered fermions is compared with Kramers equation algorithm. We find substantially different autocorrelation times for local and nonlocal observables. The calculations have been performed on the parallel computer CRAY T3D.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/hep-lat/9608120/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/hep-lat/9608120/full.md

## References

7 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/hep-lat/9608120/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/hep-lat/9608120