Undoubled Chiral Fermions on a Lattice
She-Sheng Xue

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a lattice formulation of an $SU_L(2) imes U_R(1)$ chiral theory can avoid fermion doubling and spontaneous symmetry breaking, maintaining chiral symmetry and producing a single chiral fermion in the continuum limit.
Contribution
It introduces a lattice approach with strong multifermion coupling that successfully decouples doublers and preserves chiral symmetry without breaking it.
Findings
Doublers are decoupled as massive Dirac fermions.
The spectator fermion remains free and decoupled.
A single chiral fermion persists in 1+1 dimensions.
Abstract
We analyze the dynamics of an chiral theory on the lattice with a strong multifermion coupling. It is shown that no spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs; the ``spectator'' fermion is a free mode; doublers are decoupled as massive Dirac fermions consistently with the chiral symmetries. In 1+1 dimension, we show that the right-handed three-fermion state disappears at the threshold and an undoubled left-handed chiral fermion remains in the continuum limit.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Undoubled Chiral Fermions on a Lattice
She-Sheng Xue
INFN - Milan Section, Via Celoria 16, Milan, Italy
Abstract
We analyze the dynamics of an chiral theory on the lattice with a strong multifermion coupling. It is shown that no spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs; the “spectator” fermion is a free mode; doublers are decoupled as massive Dirac fermions consistently with the chiral symmetries. In 1+1 dimension, we show that the right-handed three-fermion state disappears at the threshold and an undoubled left-handed chiral fermion remains in the continuum limit.
Since the demonstration of “no-go” theorem [2] of Nielsen and Ninomiya in 1981 the problem of chiral fermion “doubling” and “vector-like” phenomenon on a lattice still exists if one insists on preserving chiral symmetry. One of the ideas to get around this “no-go” theorem was proposed with a multifermion coupling model [3]. However, it was pointed out [5] that such a model of multifermion couplings fails to give chiral fermions in the continuum limit.
We have been studying multifermion couplings on the lattice for years [6] and we believe that such models still have a chance to work [7]. Let us consider the following fermion action of the chiral symmetries on the lattice with a multifermion coupling.
[TABLE]
where “” is the lattice spacing; () is an doublet, is an singlet and both are two-component Weyl fermions. The is treated as a “spectator” fermion. The is a second order differential operator on the lattice. The multifermion coupling is a dimension-10 operator relevant only for doublers , but irrelevant for the chiral fermions of the and . Action (1) preserves the global chiral symmetry and the can be gauged to have the exact local chiral gauge symmetry. In addition, action (1) possesses a -shift-symmetry[8],
[TABLE]
The global symmetry relating to the conservation of the fermion number of the is explicit in eq.(1).
To seek a possible segment , where an undoubled -chiral fermion exists in the continuum limit, we are bound to demonstrate the following properties of the theory in this segment:
the normal mode of is a free mode and decoupled; 2. 2.
no spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking occurs ; 3. 3.
all doublers are bound to be massive Dirac fermions and decoupled consistently with the chiral symmetry; 4. 4.
an undoubled chiral fermion of exists in the low-energy spectrum.
To prove the first and second points, we use the Ward identity stemming from the -shift-symmetry (2). Considering the generating functional of the theory,
[TABLE]
we define the effective action as the Legendre transform of . Making the parameter in eq.(2) to be space-time dependent, and varying the generating functional (3) according to the transformation rule (2) for arbitrary , we arrive at the Ward identity corresponding to the -shift-symmetry of the action (1):
[TABLE]
From this Ward identity, one can obtain all one-particle irreducible vertices containing at least one external . Taking functional derivatives of eq.(4) with respect to appropriate “primed” fields and then putting external sources , one can derive:
[TABLE]
where is the Fourier transform of , which is the Wilson factor [9]. One has
[TABLE]
Eq.(5) indicates an absence of the wave-function renormalization of the . Eqs.(6,7) show the vanishing of the NJL symmetry breaking [4] for .
To adopt the technique of strong-coupling expansion in powers of and we make a rescaling of the fermion fields
[TABLE]
For the strong coupling , the kinetic terms can be dropped and we compute the integral of in this limit:
[TABLE]
where the determinant is taken only over the lattice-space-time and “” is the number of lattice sites. For the non-zero eigenvalues of the operator , eq. (9) shows an existence of the sensible strong-coupling limit. However, as for the zero eigenvalue of the operator , this strong-coupling limit is not analytic and the strong-coupling expansion in powers of breaks down.
To show the second point concerning the NJL symmetry breaking, we calculate the two-point functions:
[TABLE]
At non-trivial leading order , we get the recursion relations:
[TABLE]
These recursion relations are not valid where the operator has zero eigenvalues. For and , the Fourier transform of these recursion relations leads to the solution (),
[TABLE]
Together with eq.(7), we prove the second point.
We turn to the third point that concerns decoupling of doublers. On this extreme strong coupling () symmetric segment, the and in (1) are bound up to form the three-fermion states[3, 7]:
[TABLE]
which carry the appropriate quantum numbers of the chiral group that accommodates and . These three-fermion states are Weyl fermions and respectively pair up with the and to be massive, neutral and charged Dirac fermions,
[TABLE]
To show this phenomenon, we compute the following two-point functions,
[TABLE]
In the lowest non-trivial order , we obtain the following recursion relations
[TABLE]
Eq.(20) suggestes that the states coupling to operators and are mixed, producing a massive four-component Dirac fermion. To find the masses, we make the Fourier transform of these recursion equations for and and obtain the inverse propagators of the charged Dirac fermions,
[TABLE]
This shows that all doublers are decoupled as massive Dirac fermions consistently with the chiral symmetries.
We are left with the last point that undoubled chiral fermions of exist in this segment. We repeat the same calculations and discussions in 1+1 dimensions, where the time direction is continuous and space is discrete. We obtain the dispersion relation corresponding to the Dirac fermion (21) for ,
[TABLE]
which is analytically continuous to low momentum states , unless it hits the threshold. For a given total momentum , we consider the system that contains three free chiral fermions, i.e. right-movers with momenta and and a left-mover with momentum (),
[TABLE]
Since NJL spontaneous symmetry breaking does not occur when , the total energy of such a system is given by
[TABLE]
where all negative-energy states have been filled. The lowest energy (the threshold) of such a system and corresponding configuration are
[TABLE]
The three-fermion state is stable if there is a gap between the threshold (25) and the energy (22) of the three-fermion state, i.e.
[TABLE]
The three-fermion state disappears, when the gap goes to zero,
[TABLE]
Substituting eqs.(22) and (25) into eq.(27), we obtain in the continuum limit , the gap
[TABLE]
where the three-fermion-state spectrum dissolves into free chiral fermion spectra. As a result, an undoubled chiral fermion exists in the continuum limit.
I thanks Profs. G. Preparata, H. B. Nielsen and E. Eichten for discussions on the last point.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1]
- 2[2] H.B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Nucl. Phys. B 185 (1981) 20; ibid. B 193 (1981) 173; Phys. Lett. B 105 (1981) 219.
- 3[3] E. Eichten and J. Preskill, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 179.
- 4[4] Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 345.
- 5[5] M.F.L. Golterman, D.N. Petcher and E. Rivas, Nucl. Phys. B 395 (1993) 597.
- 6[6] G. Preparata and S.-S. Xue, Phys. Lett. B 264 (1991) 35; ibid. B 335 (1994) 192; ibid. B 377 (1996)124; Nucl. Phys. B 26 (Proc. Suppl.) (1992) 501; ibid. B 30 (1993) 647; B 47 (1996) 583.
- 7[7] S.-S. Xue, hep-lat/9605003, to appear in Phys. Lett. B and hep-lat/9605005.
- 8[8] M.F.L. Golterman, D.N. Petcher, Phys. Lett. B 225 (1989) 159.
