Non-Perturbative versus Perturbative Renormalization of Lattice Operators
M. G\"ockeler, R. Horsley, E.-M. Ilgenfritz, H. Oelrich, H. Perlt, P., Rakow, G. Schierholz, A. Schiller

TL;DR
This paper compares non-perturbative and perturbative renormalization methods for lattice operators relevant to deep-inelastic scattering, highlighting differences and improvements in accuracy.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of non-perturbative and perturbative renormalization constants for twist-two operators in lattice QCD.
Findings
Non-perturbative renormalization yields different constants than one-loop perturbation.
Tadpole improvement enhances perturbative calculations.
Discrepancies impact the extraction of nucleon structure functions.
Abstract
Our objective is to compute the moments of the deep-inelastic structure functions of the nucleon on the lattice. A major source of uncertainty is the renormalization of the lattice operators that enter the calculation. In this talk we compare the renormalization constants of the most relevant twist-two bilinear quark operators which we have computed non-perturbatively and perturbatively to one loop order. Furthermore, we discuss the use of tadpole improved perturbation theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
