The overlap is not a waveguide
Rajamani Narayanan, Herbert Neuberger (IAS, Rutgers)

TL;DR
This paper critiques Golterman and Shamir's claim that a modified waveguide model becomes equivalent to the overlap in the limit of many matter fields, clarifying the error in their derivation.
Contribution
The paper identifies and corrects the error in Golterman and Shamir's derivation, clarifying the distinction between the waveguide model and the overlap.
Findings
Golterman and Shamir's claim is incorrect.
The modified waveguide model does not reproduce the overlap.
The overlap model works correctly in the four flavor massless Schwinger model.
Abstract
Golterman and Shamir falsely claim that a waveguide model modified by adding many charged bosonic spinors, in the limit of an infinite number of matter fields, becomes identical to the overlap if in the target theory every fermion appears in four copies. Their modified model would give wrong results even in the vectorial four flavor massless Schwinger model, while a dynamical simulation of this model with the overlap works correctly. In this note we pinpoint the error in the derivation of Golterman and Shamir.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
