Gluon Propagators and Confinement
A.Nakamura (Yamagata University), H.Aiso, M.Fukuda, T.Iwamiya,, T.Nakamura, M.Yoshida (National Aerospace Laboratory)

TL;DR
This paper investigates SU(3) gluon propagators on large lattices at different temperatures, revealing distinct behaviors in confinement and deconfinement phases, with implications for understanding gluon mass dynamics.
Contribution
It provides detailed lattice calculations of gluon propagators in both phases, highlighting their differing mass-like behaviors and the non-physical nature of slope masses.
Findings
Gluon propagators exhibit massless behavior at small and large t in confinement phase.
Effective mass in G(z) increases with z, indicating non-physical poles.
Deconfinement phase shows less massive behavior compared to confinement phase.
Abstract
We present SU(3) gluon propagators calculated on 48*48*48*N_t lattices at beta=6.8 where N_t=64 (corresponding the confinement phase) and N_t=16 (deconfinement) with the bare gauge parameter,alpha, set to be 0.1. In order to avoid Gribov copies, we employ the stochastic gauge fixing algorithm. Gluon propagators show quite different behavior from those of massless gauge fields: (1) In the confinement phase, G(t) shows massless behavior at small and large t, while around 5<t<15 it behaves as massive particle, and (2) effective mass observed in G(z) becomes larger as z increases. (3) In the deconfinement phase, G(z) shows also massive behavior but effective mass is less than in the confinement case. In all cases, slope masses are increasing functions of t or z, which can not be understood as addtional physical poles.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
