The Perturbative Method Fails in Non-Abelian Models
A.Patrascioiu, E.Seiler

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that perturbation theory fails in non-Abelian 2D nonlinear sigma models and gauge theories, due to boundary condition dependence and the emergence of super-instantons, highlighting limitations of perturbative approaches.
Contribution
It reveals the failure of perturbation theory in non-Abelian models and introduces super-instantons as a key factor in this breakdown.
Findings
Perturbation theory depends on boundary conditions in non-Abelian models.
Super-instantons dominate the low-temperature regime in these models.
Perturbative answers differ from true nonperturbative results in non-Abelian cases.
Abstract
It is shown that perturbation theory in nonlinear -models as well gauge theories in dimension produces answers that depend on boundary conditions even after the infinite volume limit has been taken. This unphysical phenomenon occurs only in the non-Abelian versions of those models, starting at . It is not present in the true (nonperturbatively defined) models and represents a failure of the perturbative method. It is related to a hitherto unnoticed type of low-lying excitation, dubbed super-instanton, that dominates the low-temperature (= weak coupling) regime of these models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
