QED: Chiral transition and the issue of triviality
Aleksandar Kocic

TL;DR
This paper reviews lattice QED studies, emphasizing analytical methods, bounds on critical exponents, and the non-triviality of QED, concluding that data supports non-Gaussian power law scaling.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of lattice QED, derives bounds for critical exponents, and clarifies the non-trivial nature of QED through data analysis.
Findings
Triviality is ruled out on theoretical grounds.
Data supports power law scaling with non-Gaussian exponents.
Analytical methods are effective in data analysis.
Abstract
I give a review and progress report on studies of lattice QED. I emphasize analytical results and methods that are applied in data analysis. Also, I derive some bounds for the critical exponents and establish their connection with scaling violations. Triviality, as realized in theory, is ruled out on theoretical grounds. I show that the present data, if analyzed correctly, all lead to the same conclusions. They are compatible with power law scaling with nongaussian exponents.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
