High-loop perturbative renormalization constants for Lattice QCD (I): finite constants for Wilson quark currents
F. Di Renzo, V. Miccio, L. Scorzato, C. Torrero

TL;DR
This paper computes high-order perturbative renormalization constants for Wilson fermions in Lattice QCD using Numerical Stochastic Perturbation Theory, demonstrating the feasibility of high-loop calculations and analyzing their uncertainties.
Contribution
It provides the first high-loop (up to four loops) perturbative results for renormalization constants in Lattice QCD with Wilson quarks, including finite size effects and convergence analysis.
Findings
High-loop renormalization constants are computationally feasible.
Results include three- and four-loop expansions for various flavors.
Uncertainties are mainly from truncation errors, assessed via Boosted Perturbation Theory.
Abstract
We present a high order perturbative computation of the renormalization constants Z_V, Z_A and of the ratio Z_P/Z_S for Wilson fermions. The computational setup is the one provided by the RI'-MOM scheme. Three- and four-loop expansions are made possible by Numerical Stochastic Perturbation Theory. Results are given for various numbers of flavours and/or (within a finite accuracy) for generic n_f up to three loops. For the case n_f=2 we also present four-loop results. Finite size effects are well under control and the continuum limit is taken by means of hypercubic symmetric Taylor expansions. The main indetermination comes from truncation errors, which should be assessed in connection with convergence properties of the series. The latter is best discussed in the framework of Boosted Perturbation Theory, whose impact we try to assess carefully. Final results and their uncertainties show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
