Analysis of systematic errors in the calculation of renormalization constants of the topological susceptibility on the lattice
B. Alles (Pisa INFN), M. D'Elia (Genoa Univ.), A. Di Giacomo (Pisa, Univ.), C. Pica (Pisa Univ.)

TL;DR
This paper compares two methods for calculating renormalization constants of topological susceptibility on the lattice, finding good agreement and discussing the independence of the renormalization constant from background charge.
Contribution
It introduces a Ginsparg-Wilson based calibration method and compares it with cooling, providing insights into their consistency and properties.
Findings
Methods agree within 3-4% statistical errors
Renormalization constant Z is independent of background topological charge
Provides validation for Ginsparg-Wilson based calibration
Abstract
A Ginsparg-Wilson based calibration of the topological charge is used to calculate the renormalization constants which appear in the field-theoretical determination of the topological susceptibility on the lattice. A systematic comparison is made with calculations based on cooling. The two methods agree within present statistical errors (3%-4%). We also discuss the independence of the multiplicative renormalization constant Z from the background topological charge used to determine it.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
