Topological susceptibility with three flavors of staggered quarks
C. Aubin (1), C. Bernard (1), Brian Billeter (2), C. DeTar (2), Steven, Gottlieb (3), E. Gregory (4), U.M. Heller (5), J.E. Hetrick (6), J. Osborn, (2), R.L. Sugar (7), D. Toussaint (4) ((1) Wash. U., (2) U. Utah, (3) Indiana, U., (4) U. Arizona, (5) APS, (6) U. Pacific

TL;DR
This study tests the validity of the staggered-fermion fourth-root trick by examining topological susceptibility suppression in QCD with 2+1 flavors, using improved techniques and chiral perturbation theory for accurate results.
Contribution
It provides new lattice QCD results on topological susceptibility with 2+1 flavors, incorporating taste-breaking effects and continuum extrapolation, supporting the validity of the staggered fermion approach.
Findings
Results agree with chiral perturbation theory predictions.
Taste-breaking effects are effectively modeled, reducing scaling violations.
Continuum extrapolation yields consistent susceptibility values.
Abstract
As one test of the validity of the staggered-fermion fourth-root determinant trick, we examine the suppression of the topological susceptibility of the QCD vacuum in the limit of small quark mass. The suppression is sensitive to the number of light sea quark flavors. Our study is done in the presence of 2+1 flavors of dynamical quarks in the improved staggered fermion formulation. Variance-reduction techniques provide better control of statistical errors. New results from staggered chiral perturbation theory account for taste-breaking effects in the low-quark mass behavior of the susceptibility, thereby reducing scaling violations from this source. Measurements over a range of quark masses at two lattice spacings permit a rough continuum extrapolation to remove the remaining lattice artifacts. The results are consistent with chiral perturbation theory with the correct flavor counting.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
