The fermion determinant in (4,4) 2d lattice super-Yang-Mills
Joel Giedt

TL;DR
This paper investigates the sign problem in lattice formulations of (4,4) 2D super-Yang-Mills, revealing that the fermion determinant is not always positive, which impacts simulation approaches.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the fermion determinant in certain lattice supersymmetric actions can be non-positive, highlighting a challenge for numerical simulations of these theories.
Findings
Fermion determinant is not generally positive in the studied lattice actions.
Implications for lattice simulation methods due to the sign problem.
Preliminary phase analysis of the fermion determinant in the phase-quenched ensemble.
Abstract
We find that the fermion determinant is not generally positive in a class of lattice actions recently constructed by Cohen et al. [hep-lat/0307012]; these are actions that contain an exact lattice supersymmetry and have as their target (continuum) theory (4,4) 2-dimensional super-Yang-Mills. We discuss the implications of this finding for lattice simulations and give some preliminary results for the phase of the determinant in the phase-quenched ensemble.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
