Light Hadron Spectroscopy with Two Flavors of Dynamical Quarks on the Lattice
CP-PACS Collaboration: A. Ali Khan, S. Aoki, G. Boyd, R. Burkhalter,, S. Ejiri, M. Fukugita, S. Hashimoto, N. Ishizuka, Y. Iwasaki, K. Kanaya, T., Kaneko, Y. Kuramashi, T. Manke, K. Nagai, M. Okawa, H.P. Shanahan, A. Ukawa,, T. Yoshie

TL;DR
This paper reports on lattice QCD simulations with two dynamical quark flavors, showing that including sea quarks improves agreement with experimental meson masses and provides insights into baryon mass deviations and decay constants.
Contribution
It presents the first detailed lattice QCD results with two dynamical flavors using improved actions, demonstrating closer alignment with experimental data compared to quenched approximations.
Findings
Two-flavor full QCD meson masses are closer to experimental values.
Light quark masses are reduced by about 25% compared to quenched QCD.
Full QCD baryon masses for strange baryons agree with experiments.
Abstract
We present results of a numerical calculation of lattice QCD with two degenerate flavors of dynamical quarks, identified with up and down quarks, and with a strange quark treated in the quenched approximation. The lattice action and simulation parameters are chosen with a view to carrying out an extrapolation to the continuum limit as well as chiral extrapolations. Gauge configurations are generated with a renormalization-group improved gauge action and a mean field improved clover quark action at three values of and four sea quark masses. The sizes of lattice are chosen so that the physical spatial size is kept constant. Hadron masses, light quark masses and meson decay constants are measured at five valence quark masses. We also carry out complementary quenched simulations with the same improved actions. The quenched spectrum from this analysis agrees well in the continuum…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
