Cost of Generalised HMC Algorithms for Free Field Theory
A. D. Kennedy, Brian Pendleton

TL;DR
This paper analytically evaluates the computational efficiency of the Generalised Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for free field theory, optimizing parameters and comparing it to other algorithms.
Contribution
It provides an analytical study of GHMC's cost, optimizing parameters, and comparing its efficiency and critical exponents to HMC and L2MC algorithms.
Findings
Long trajectories are optimal for GHMC.
HMC is more efficient than L2MC and Kramers-based algorithms.
HMC and L2MC have the same volume dependence, but different critical exponents.
Abstract
We study analytically the computational cost of the Generalised Hybrid Monte Carlo (GHMC) algorithm for free field theory. We calculate the autocorrelation functions of operators quadratic in the fields, and optimise the GHMC momentum mixing angle, the trajectory length, and the integration stepsize. We show that long trajectories are optimal for GHMC, and that standard HMC is much more efficient than algorithms based on the Second Order Langevin (L2MC) or Kramers Equation. We show that contrary to naive expectations HMC and L2MC have the same volume dependence, but their dynamical critical exponents are z=1 and z=3/2 respectively.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
