TL;DR
This paper reviews the features of NLO pQCD programs and emphasizes the importance of understanding their accuracy in different phase space regions for interpreting HERA experiment data.
Contribution
It compares NLO pQCD programs and highlights the need to identify phase space regions where calculations are reliable.
Findings
NLO pQCD programs have varying features.
Accuracy of NLO calculations depends on phase space regions.
Understanding these regions is crucial for data interpretation.
Abstract
This paper summarizes a talk presented at the Durham HERA '98 Workshop. We compare the features that are available in NLO pQCD programs and demonstrate that understanding where in phase space NLO calculations are accurate is vital for extracting information from measurements at the HERA experiments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.