Improved Measurement of the Form Factors in the Decay Lambda_c^+ --> Lambda e^+ nu_e
J. W. Hinson, et al, CLEO Collaboration

TL;DR
This study precisely measures the form factors and decay asymmetry in Lambda_c^+ decays using the CLEO detector, providing insights into the weak decay dynamics and CP symmetry.
Contribution
It presents the first detailed four-dimensional analysis of Lambda_c^+ decay form factors and tests for CP violation with improved accuracy.
Findings
Measured form factor ratio R = -0.31 +/- 0.05(stat) +/- 0.04(syst)
Determined pole mass M_{pole} = 2.21 +/- 0.08(stat) +/- 0.14(syst) GeV/c^2
Found no evidence for CP violation, A_{Lambda_c} = 0.00 +/- 0.03(stat) +/- 0.01(syst) +/- 0.02
Abstract
Using the CLEO detector at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring, we have studied the distribution of kinematic variables in the decay Lambda_c^+ -> Lambda e^+ nu_e. By performing a four-dimensional maximum likelihood fit, we determine the form factor ratio, R = f_2/f_1 = -0.31 +/- 0.05(stat) +/- 0.04(syst), the pole mass, M_{pole} = (2.21 +/- 0.08(stat) +/- 0.14(syst)) GeV/c^2, and the decay asymmetry parameter of the Lambda_c, alpha_{Lambda_c} = -0.86 +/- 0.03(stat) +/- 0.02(syst), for <q^2> = 0.67 (GeV/c^2)^2. We compare the angular distributions of the Lambda_c^+ and Lambda_c^- and find no evidence for CP-violation: A_{Lambda_c} = (alpha_{Lambda_c^+} + alpha_{Lambda_c^-})/ (alpha_{Lambda_c^+} - alpha_{Lambda_c^-}) = 0.00 +/- 0.03(stat) +/- 0.01(syst) +/- 0.02, where the third error is from the uncertainty in the world average of the CP-violating parameter, A_{Lambda}, for Lambda -> p…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
