Systematic Errors: facts and fictions
Roger Barlow

TL;DR
This paper discusses the common mishandling of systematic errors in scientific practice, clarifying their meaning and providing guidance for proper treatment to improve research accuracy.
Contribution
It clarifies the ambiguous concept of systematic errors and offers practical guidance to improve their treatment in scientific research.
Findings
Highlights common misunderstandings of systematic errors
Provides clear guidelines for proper handling of systematic errors
Aims to improve accuracy and reliability in scientific measurements
Abstract
The treatment of systematic errors is often mishandled. This is due to lack of understanding and education, based on a fundamental ambiguity as to what is meant by the term. This note addresses the problems and offers guidance to good practice.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
