Upper limits for neutrino oscillations muon-antineutrino to electron-antineutrino from muon decay at rest
KARMEN collaboration: B. Armbruster, I. M. Blair, B. A. Bodmann, N. E., Booth, G. Drexlin, J. A. Edgington, C. Eichner, K. Eitel, E. Finckh, H., Gemmeke, J. Hoessl, T. Jannakos, P. Juenger, M. Kleifges, J. Kleinfeller, W., Kretschmer, R. Maschuw, C. Oehler, P. Plischke

TL;DR
The KARMEN experiment searched for muon-antineutrino to electron-antineutrino oscillations using decay-at-rest neutrinos, found no evidence, and set new upper limits on oscillation parameters, challenging previous claims by LSND.
Contribution
This study provides new upper limits on neutrino oscillation parameters, significantly constraining the parameter space suggested by earlier experiments.
Findings
No evidence for ueb appearance in the data.
Set upper limits: sin^2(2theta)<1.7x10^-3 for Dm^2>100 eV^2.
Excluded the favored parameter region of LSND.
Abstract
The KARMEN experiment at the spallation neutron source ISIS used \numub from \mup--decay at rest in the search for neutrino oscillations \numubnueb in the appearance mode, with p(\nueb,e+)n as detection reaction of \nueb. In total, 15 candidates fulfill all conditions for the \nueb signature, in agreement with the background expectation of 15.8+-0.5 events, yielding no indication for oscillations. A single event based likelihood analysis leads to upper limits on the oscillation parameters: sin^2(2theta)<1.7x10e-3 for Dm^2>100 eV^2 and Dm^2<0.055 eV^2 for sin^2(2theta)=1 at 90% confidence. Thus, KARMEN does not confirm the LSND experiment and restricts significantly its favored parameter region for \numubnueb.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
