Nonmesonic decay of the Lambda-hyperon in hypernuclei produced by p+Au collisions
B. Kamys (1), P. Kulessa (2), H. Ohm (2), K. Pysz (3), Z.Rudy (1), H., Stroeher (2), W. Cassing (4) ((1) M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics,, Jagellonian University, Cracow, Poland, (2) Institut fuer Kernphysik,, Forschungszentrum Juelich, Germany

TL;DR
This study measures the nonmesonic decay lifetime of Lambda-hyperons in hypernuclei produced by proton-gold collisions, revealing potential violations of the Delta I = 1/2 rule in weak hyperon decays.
Contribution
It provides the first measurement of Lambda-hyperon nonmesonic decay in heavy hypernuclei produced via proton collisions, suggesting possible rule violations.
Findings
Heavy hypernuclei with A≈180 fission with a lifetime of ~130 ps.
Results indicate a 90% confidence level violation of the Delta I = 1/2 rule.
Supports the hypothesis of non-standard weak decay mechanisms in hypernuclei.
Abstract
The lifetime of the Lambda-hyperon for the nonmesonic decay Lambda N ---> N N has been determined by a measurement at COSY Juelich of the delayed fission of heavy hypernuclei produced in proton - Au collisions at T_p=1.9 GeV. It is found that heavy hypernuclei with mass numbers A= 180 +- 5 and atomic numbers Z= 74 +-2 fission with a lifetime 130ps +- 13ps (stat.) +- 15ps (syst.) . This value together with the results obtained for other heavy hypernuclei in previous investigations indicates (on the confidence level of 0.9) a violation of the phenomenological Delta I = 1/2 rule for Lambda N ---> NN transitions as known from the weak mesonic decays of kaons and hyperons. PACS: {13.30.-a}{Decays of baryons} {13.75.Ev}{Hyperon-nucleon interaction} {21.80}{Hypernuclei} {25.80.Pw}{Hyperon-induced reactions}
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
