A problem of hypothetical emerging of matter objects on horizon in the standard model of universe
V. Skalsky
TL;DR
This paper critically examines the hypothesis that matter objects emerge on the universe's horizon to explain mass increase, finding it incompatible with gravity theory.
Contribution
It provides a physical analysis showing the inconsistency of the horizon-emerging matter hypothesis with established gravity principles.
Findings
Horizon-emerging matter hypothesis contradicts gravity theory
Mass increase in the universe cannot be explained by horizon emergence
Physical analysis challenges existing assumptions in cosmology
Abstract
In the standard model of universe the increase in mass of our observed expansive Universe is explained by the assumption of emerging the matter objects on the horizon (of the most remote visibility). However, the physical analysis of the influence of this assumption on the velocity of matter objects shows unambiguously that this hypothetical assumption contradicts the theory of gravity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements · Relativity and Gravitational Theory