
TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which Tolman models can approach the Vaidya metric limit, revealing that only hollow dust distributions, like the self-similar case, permit such a limit, and clarifying assumptions in previous demonstrations.
Contribution
It identifies the specific Tolman models that can approach the Vaidya limit and corrects a hidden assumption in prior work on this limit.
Findings
Only hollow dust Tolman models have a Vaidya limit.
Dense Tolman models with shell-focusing singularities lack a Vaidya equivalent.
A different coordinate transformation is needed to properly demonstrate the Vaidya limit.
Abstract
We show that the only Tolman models which permit a Vaidya limit are those having a dust distribution that is hollow - such as the self-similar case. Thus the naked shell-focussing singularities found in Tolman models that are dense through the origin have no Vaidya equivalent. This also casts light on the nature of the Vaidya metric. We point out a hidden assumption in Lemos' demonstration that the Vaidya metric is a null limit of the Tolman metric, and in generalising his result, we find that a different transformation of coordinates is required.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
