Comment on: Topological Invariants, instantons, and the chiral anomaly on spaces with torsion
Dirk Kreimer, Eckehard W.Mielke

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the form of the chiral anomaly in Riemann-Cartan spacetimes with torsion, showing that only the Pontrjagin term appears, not the Nieh-Yan term, contrary to recent claims.
Contribution
It demonstrates through renormalization group arguments that the chiral anomaly in torsioned spacetimes includes only the Pontrjagin form, correcting previous misconceptions.
Findings
Only the Pontrjagin four-form appears in the anomaly.
The Nieh-Yan term does not contribute to the anomaly.
Clarifies the role of torsion in chiral anomalies.
Abstract
In Riemann-Cartan spacetimes with torsion only its axial covector piece couples to massive Dirac fields. Using renormalization group arguments, we show that besides the familiar Riemannian term only the Pontrjagin type four-form does arise additionally in the chiral anomaly, but not the Nieh-Yan term , as has been claimed in a recent paper [PRD 55, 7580 (1997)].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
