Why the Quantum Must Yield to Gravity
Joy Christian (Oxford University)

TL;DR
This paper critically examines Penrose's gravitationally induced quantum state reduction proposal, highlighting its limitations in the Newtonian regime and proposing alternative experiments involving superposed mass distributions to empirically test the theory.
Contribution
It critiques Penrose's collapse time formula, demonstrates its limitations in the Newtonian limit, and suggests new experimental setups involving superposed rotations for empirical validation.
Findings
Penrose's collapse time diverges in the Newtonian limit
Non-rotating mass distribution experiments are inadequate
Leggett-type SQUID or BEC experiments can test Penrose's theory
Abstract
After providing an extensive overview of the conceptual elements -- such as Einstein's `hole argument' -- that underpin Penrose's proposal for gravitationally induced quantum state reduction, the proposal is constructively criticised. Penrose has suggested a mechanism for objective reduction of quantum states with postulated collapse time T = h/E, where E is an ill-definedness in the gravitational self-energy stemming from the profound conflict between the principles of superposition and general covariance. Here it is argued that, even if Penrose's overall conceptual scheme for the breakdown of quantum mechanics is unreservedly accepted, his formula for the collapse time of superpositions reduces to T --> oo (E --> 0) in the strictly Newtonian regime, which is the domain of his proposed experiment to corroborate the effect. A suggestion is made to rectify this situation. In particular,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
