One-loop stress-tensor renormalization in curved background: the relation between $\zeta$-function and point-splitting approaches, and an improved point-splitting procedure
Valter Moretti (Math. Dept. Trento University)

TL;DR
This paper rigorously compares the $ abla$-function and point-splitting methods for stress-tensor renormalization in curved spacetime, generalizing previous results and proposing an improved, broadly applicable point-splitting procedure compatible with various geometries.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence of $ abla$-function and an improved point-splitting method in curved backgrounds, generalizes previous results, and introduces a robust procedure applicable beyond closed manifolds.
Findings
The $ abla$-function and point-splitting methods yield equivalent stress tensor results.
The improved point-splitting procedure works for any field mass and general geometries.
The method correctly reproduces stress tensors in Minkowski spacetime for $m^2 \\geq 0$.
Abstract
We conclude the rigorous analysis of a previous paper concerning the relation between the (Euclidean) point-splitting approach and the local -function procedure to renormalize physical quantities at one-loop in (Euclidean) QFT in curved spacetime. The stress tensor is now considered in general -dimensional closed manifolds for positive scalar operators . Results obtained in previous works (in the case D=4 and ) are rigorously proven and generalized. It is also proven that, in static Euclidean manifolds, the method is compatible with Lorentzian-time analytic continuations. It is found that, for , the result of the function procedure is the same obtained from an improved version of the point-splitting method which uses a particular choice of the term in the Hadamard expansion of the Green function. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
