Dominant Topologies in Euclidean Quantum Gravity
S. Carlip

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the dominant topologies in Euclidean quantum gravity vary with the sign of the cosmological constant, revealing distinct topological phases and implications for the cosmological constant problem.
Contribution
It identifies the different topological phases in Euclidean quantum gravity depending on the sign of the cosmological constant, highlighting a boundary at zero.
Findings
For $ ext{ extLambda}>0$, dominant topologies have vanishing first Betti number.
For $ ext{ extLambda}<0$, the sum over topologies is dominated by complex fundamental groups.
The case $ ext{ extLambda}=0$ acts as a boundary between these phases.
Abstract
The dominant topologies in the Euclidean path integral for quantum gravity differ sharply according on the sign of the cosmological constant. For , saddle points can occur only for topologies with vanishing first Betti number and finite fundamental group. For , on the other hand, the path integral is dominated by topologies with extremely complicated fundamental groups; while the contribution of each individual manifold is strongly suppressed, the ``density of topologies'' grows fast enough to overwhelm this suppression. The value is thus a sort of boundary between phases in the sum over topologies. I discuss some implications for the cosmological constant problem and the Hartle-Hawking wave function.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
