Issues in gravitational wave data analysis
Lee Samuel Finn (Northwestern University)

TL;DR
This paper discusses the challenges in gravitational wave data analysis by comparing Bayesian and Frequentist statistical methods for inferring signals and source locations.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of how Bayesian and Frequentist approaches differ in gravitational wave data inference, highlighting their respective strengths and limitations.
Findings
Bayesian methods incorporate prior information effectively.
Frequentist approaches focus on long-term frequency properties.
Both methods have unique advantages depending on the context.
Abstract
Data analysis is the application of probability and statistics to draw inference from observation. Is a signal present or absent? Is the source an inspiraling binary system or a supernova? At what point in the sky is the radiation incident from? In these notes I want to address how two different statistical methodologies --- Bayesian and Frequentist --- approach the problem of statistical inference
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Seismic Waves and Analysis
